Not Being There by Chance

by Steve Rockwell

Author Jerzy Kosiński’s end-of-life note was short and to the point: “I am going to put myself to sleep now for a bit longer than usual. Call the time Eternity.” Hemisphere House in New York City became the setting for Kosiński’s final, increasingly difficult years. On May 3, 1991, he died by suicide in his West 57th Street apartment bathroom, while his wife slept. Subsequently, she discovered him naked in a half-filled bathtub with a plastic bag tied around his head.

Jerzy Kosinski, The Hermit of 69th Street book cover
Jerzy Kosinski, The Hermit of 69th Street book cover

I attended Kosiński’s 1987 Toronto lecture, at the end of which he quite eagerly consented to take part in my Pick a Number from 1 to 99 project. At the corner of Hazelton and Yorkville streets, within a week or so after the talk, a chance encounter with the author took place. Information about a future exhibition possibility of my “Numbers,” was conveyed. At the point where Kosinski was handing me his business card, however, a female companion arrived with a bulky shopping bag. Popping the trunk of the parked car, she urged, “Come on, Jerzy. We gotta go!”

Steve Rockwell, Pick a Number between 1 and 99, 1987, printed form with ink, 8.5 x 5.5 inches. Form signed by Jerzy Kosinski on May 3, 1987 at his Toronto "Being there" talk
Steve Rockwell, Pick a Number Between 1 and 99, 1987, printed form with ink, 8.5 x 5.5 inches. Form signed by Jerzy Kosiński on May 3, 1987 at his Toronto “Being There” talk

A memorable part of Kosiński’s Being There talk, was learning about Peter Sellers’ absolute obsession with wanting to play Chauncey Gardiner in the film of Kosiński’s book. As a contrast to Clouseau‘s voices, disguises, and physical comedy, his Being There character became a suppression of performance – two extremes of the same actor. The Clouseau character had evolved considerably. Initially, in the 1963 Pink Panther, he was not intended to dominate the film. David Niven’s jewel thief, Sir Charles Lytton, was closer to the central figure. Sellers’ performance, however, was so distinctive that Clouseau effectively took over the series.

Peter Sellers in Return of the Pink Panther (1975)
Peter Sellers in Return of the Pink Panther (1975). His Inspector Jacques Clouseau with oversized light trench coat, gloves, narrow tie, moustache, and absurd detective’s hat became one of cinema’s most recognizable comic images

Excerpts of Kosiński’s Toronto talk were preserved by Harper’s Magazine under the title, “Cake Killer.” Here the author makes the point that modern culture aggressively forces the writer out from behind his books into the predatory glare of public celebrity. Annie Leibovitz photographed him as a shirtless polo player for the cover of New York Times Magazine. The result: “Once a novelist is portrayed half-naked, as I was, on the cover of a magazine, his profile clearly changes.” They lose their literary uniqueness, making them “no different than any public figure.”

Peter Sellers as Chance walking across water in the 1979 film adaptation of Being There directed by Hal Ashby
Peter Sellers as Chance walking across water in the 1979 film adaptation of Being There directed by Hal Ashby

Kosiński considered himself an autofiction writer, a literary genre that blends autobiography (factual life history) and fiction. The author of a memoir is expected not to lie. With autofiction, the reader understands that the author will make things up for artistic effect. It’s also a given that our memories are unreliable. Personally, I had been cautious and suspicious of the autofiction genre. One of the objectives of my 1987 Pick a Number art project, was to clearly separate the art from the factual with a “signed and dated agreement.”

“Who Killed Jerzy Kosiński?” was a 2023 Vanity Fair article by Wayne Lawson. Lawson argues that Kosiński’s suicide cannot be understood separately from the public destruction of his identity as a writer. To this he adds: serious physical illness, fear of cognitive decline, and profound depression. The larger question might be: Did Jerzy Kosiński die partly because the public could no longer distinguish the man from the mythology he had created around himself?

Roman Polanski at the exact moment when Rosemary's Baby had made him internationally famous and when his circle overlapped with Kosiński, Wojciech Frykowski, Sharon Tate, and Abigail Folger
Roman Polanski photographed at the moment when Rosemary’s Baby had made him internationally famous and when his circle overlapped with Kosiński, Wojciech Frykowski, Sharon Tate, and Abigail Folger

Is it far fetched to consider lingering survivor guilt from 1969? Jerzy Kosiński has stated that he received an invitation to visit Roman Polanski and Sharon Tate at Cielo Drive on the night of the Manson murders. Kosiński and Roman Polanski had known one another since their youth in Poland and had remained connected after both achieved international success. He had received a letter from Wojciech (Voytek) Frykowski and Abigail Folger while travelling in Europe, with plans for the Kosińskis eventually to meet the group in Los Angeles.

On the night of Friday, August 8, 1969, Sharon Tate, Abigail Folger, Voytek Frykowski and Jay Sebring were murdered at 10050 Cielo Drive. An airline baggage mix-up had diverted Kosiński and Kiki’s luggage while returning from Europe. The delay prevented them from continuing to Los Angeles as planned. Polanski, in his 1984 autobiography, denied that Kosiński had been invited to the house that night. Yet, a friend of Kosiński later wrote to The New York Times asserting that he had seen an invitation addressed to Kosiński. In any case, Polanski himself had been away in London at the time.

Peter Greenaway’s Drowning by Numbers (1988) with Joely Richardson, Juliet Stevenson, and Joan Plowright

Film maker Peter Greenaway releases Drowning by Numbers in 1988. The film is structured around three drowning-murders with a hidden conceptual counting out from 1 to 100. On May 2, 1991, the night before his death, Kosiński went to dinner and then a viewing of Drowning by Numbers with Polish jazz singer Urszula Dudziak. The following morning, he dies in a bathtub in his Hemisphere House apartment.

The Little Detail that Wags the Big Picture

by Steve Rockwell

In 1940 Murray Burnett, co-wrote Everybody Comes to Rick’s with Joan Alison. The play, though not produced, served as a model for Rick’s Café in the story that became Casablanca. Rick’s Café had not been a complete screenwriter invention. A few years prior, Burnett and his wife had stumbled on a café in the south of France. The experience stayed with them. Its mixture of refugees, expatriates, and assorted adventurers, mingling in the shadow of an impending war, had made the moment unforgettable.

Humphrey Bogart and  Dooley Wilson, as Sam, the pianist and singer at Rick's Café Américain in Casablanca (1942)
Humphrey Bogart and Dooley Wilson, as Sam, the pianist and singer at Rick’s Café Américain in Casablanca (1942)

When released in 1942, Casablanca became one of the most influential films in Hollywood history. Somehow, popular entertainment, political drama, and romance, molded into something durable that withstood the test of time. Casablanca became art without announcing itself as “art.”

A cocktail from Hotel Eggers in Gothenburg, Sweden at its historic American Bar, which dates from 1884
A signature cocktail at Hotel Eggers in Gothenburg, Sweden at its historic American Bar, dating from 1884

La Belle Aurore, the café that Burnett experienced in 1938 in the south of France, may have been just one of many potential models for Rick’s Café. It has been suggested that the American Bar at Hotel Eggers in Gothenburg, Sweden, might also have fit the bill. The hotel itself was built in 1859, making it one of the oldest continuously-operating hotels in Europe. Their American Bar was completed in 1884, predating the fictional Rick’s Café Américain of Casablanca by over 60 years.

Conrad Veidt plays Major Heinrich Strasser, the senior German officer sent to Casablanca in Casablanca, against Claude Rains's Captain Renault to his right
Conrad Veidt plays Major Heinrich Strasser, the senior German officer sent to Casablanca in Casablanca, against Claude Rains‘s Captain Renault to his right

In 1942, Hotel Eggers hosted a similar cast of wartime characters. Already, by the 1890s, besides its American Bar and restaurant, they had the Moriska Café – Moorish, Moroccan atmosphere of their own. Humphrey Bogart’s Rick Blaine is neither the conventional romantic hero nor the traditional action hero. Though his shell of tough guy cynicism eventually breaks, his public declaration of “neutrality” is clear, “I stick my neck out for nobody.” At Hotel Eggers the “tough guy” had been Ebba Eggers. In 1942 at her husband Axel’s passing, she went from liquor cashier at the American Bar to full operational management and owner. By reputation, she ran the “velvet” establishment with an iron hand.

Neutrality at Eggers was strictly enforced by the Swedish Secret Service. While a British naval attaché might be sipping a dry martini at one counter, a Nazi trade delegate might be sitting in the adjacent velvet booth. At Rick’s Café, these bristling edges would have been smoothed by Sam’s piano and song, anchoring the room emotionally. Played by Dooley Wilson, he is one of the film’s most important supporting characters.

Jussi Björling (1911–1960), Sweden's great tenor. Hôtel Eggers in Gothenburg was one of his regular hotels
Jussi Björling (1911–1960), Sweden’s great tenor. Hôtel Eggers in Gothenburg was one of his regular hotels

Eggers had an equally legendary musical connection, only real. Opera tenor Jussi Björling made the American Bar at Eggers his personal playground. While spies were mapping out shipping lanes in the corners, Björling was unwinding at the bar, holding court with admirers. He had made this his sanctuary away from an exhausting global performance schedule. Because of its superb acoustics, it had to be Room 136, on the first floor. With its balcony overlooking Drottningtorget, the door ajar, he loved to practice the scales. Björling had become an international star after performances in Vienna. The Metropolitan Opera in New York became his principal international stage.

Depending on its use, something no larger than the olive in a martini, became a focal point in the war. Gothenburg SKF was the world’s leading manufacture of these parts, and Hotel Eggers sat just 78 steps from the Gothenburg Central Station. Its location was ideal for surveillance. The intelligence battleground centred on a component vital to both the Nazi Luftwaffe and and Allied aircraft production – ball bearings.

Gay Viking was particularly successful, completing several runs carrying Swedish SKF ball bearings and other strategic materials back to Britain.
Gay Viking was particularly successful, completing several runs carrying Swedish SKF ball bearings and other strategic materials back to Britain

Code-named by MI6 as Operation Bridford, the brains behind it had been George Binney. Its objective was simple – bring ball bearings, and other strategic materials to Britain. Binney modified a fleet of high-speed Motor Gun Boats, and disguised them as civilian merchant vessels. Gay Viking was the first to pierce the German blockade, supplying 40 tons of high-grade ball bearings and specialized machine tools.

Casablanca was directed by Michael Curtiz and starred Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman
Casablanca was directed by Michael Curtiz and starred Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman

Ebba’s tenure at Hotel Eggers, however, turned out to be short-lived. On February 12, 1948, she was a passenger aboard the Danish Air Lines DC-3 Sejr Viking, flying from Copenhagen to Zürich with a planned stop at Frankfurt. The aircraft crashed near Ulrichstein, Germany. Ebba was among those killed. Her death brought the Eggers family era of the hotel to an end.

The last scene in Casablanca, Humphrey Bogart as Rick at the airport with Ilsa, the Ingrid Bergman character having boarded her flight
The last scene in Casablanca, Humphrey Bogart as Rick at the airport with Ilsa, the Ingrid Bergman character having boarded her flight

Just three years after the tragedy in 1951, our family arrived in Gothenburg, Sweden. Travelling as we had by rail from Stockholm, in just 78 steps we had a temporary home in a white hotel in the shape of a square with a courtyard. As a five-year-old by the window, after endless hours facing the interior, this particular feature of Hotel Eggers as a designed space, etched into my mind permanently.

Steve Rockwell, 1996, Meditations on Space (Galerie Jamileh Weber, Zürich, Switzerland, acrylic on masonite, 32 x 32 inches
Steve Rockwell, 1996, Meditations on Space (Galerie Jamileh Weber, Zürich, Switzerland), acrylic on masonite, 32 x 32 inches

Later in life, these early reflections laid the groundwork for a series of fabricated panels. Painted white and modelled after the hotel structure, each 32 x 32 inch square had an 1/8″ cut to define a border and a 24 x 24 inch interior “courtyard.” Inspired by 175 visits to gallery spaces in Europe and North America, the “meditations” had begun at the Bruno Bischofberger Gallery in Zürich, Switzerland. My project ended in Los Angeles, California at the Zero One Gallery in 1997. The Zürich business that Ebba Eggers had intended in 1948 had been left for future fulfillment.

Zsolt Ferenczy’s Magical surrealism

by Emese Krunák-Hajagos

When I walked into Zsolt Ferenczy’s large studio in Miskolc (Hungary) I was surrounded by large paintings and drawings that caught my attention with their vivid colours and unique figurative. I fell in love with It’s time (Itt az idő, 2020) at first sight. A very challenging work, with many layers of meaning, that invites endless possible narratives. I think this painting encompasses all of Ferenczy’s painterly symbolism and creative methods.

Let’s start with the animals that appear in his works. The monkey is an important one, recurring in many of his paintings. The one in Dark Material (Sötét anyag, 2020) refers to Frans Jansz Post’s painting View of Olinda (1662). It takes us to the Dutch colonies of Brazil. Post depicts a beautiful landscape with exotic animals. Ferenczy’s starting point is also a landscape but a very different one that is urban and imaginary at the same time. The monkey from Post’s painting is leaning against a red metal dumpster. His body is almost human with a sarcastic smile on its face. Exotic birds fly over palm trees and rich vegetation. The purple material—the ‘dark material’—seems to be solid and porous at the same time. The purple shapes remind us of mountains. But what are they really? Are they man-made or did they come from somewhere else? Are they nuclear and dangerous or just a byproduct of some digging?

The sky is also mystical. The layered pink cloud-shapes seem to move upward. It could easily be the smoke from a nuclear explosion. The colored stripes in front of it might be ‘fences’ trying to separate the two worlds to protect us. There is an idyllic forest in the middle of the composition contrasted by the red dumpster with the dark material and the pink clouds. A weird, foreboding environment.

Zsolt Ferenczy: Dark Material, 2020, acrylic on canvas, 200 x 115 cm
Zsolt Ferenczy: Dark Material, 2020, acrylic on canvas, 200 x 115 cm

Figures are central elements in Ferenczy’s paintings. His research for his paintings is very sophisticated. He has wide and varied interests that seemingly don’t relate; deep, updated knowledge in anthropology, history (both natural and human), art history, stories of animal and human mutations, among many other fields. The series called Bestiary (2019–2020) include pieces containing images of human evolution and mixed races (casta) entitled The Burden of the Past. Iceman (Jégember, 2019–2020) is a reconstruction of the face of a creature we know as a Yeti or Bigfoot. A very tall and large-footed being, who reportedly has been seen in various places on Earth. The portrait is very dramatic, the black ink flows over the surface, the dark eyes, hair and beard suggest the hidden nature of the creature. What makes this series even more interesting is the cardboard base. Cardboard boxes are used in the transport of goods. Ferenczy “considers the box to be an important symbol of global trade.” Then, after they fulfilled their duty, they get discarded. The artist pinpoints the similarities between the fate of those boxed and creatures that are extinct or on the verge of extinction. He reconstructs some of them, like the Tasmanian Wolf, among other mutated animals, like a two headed sheep.

Zsolt Feranczy, Bestiary, Iceman (The Burden of the Past), 2019 – 2020, ink, acrylic, plastic tubes on cardboard, 210 x 120 cm (left) and Tasmanian Wolf, 2019 – 2020, ink, acrylic, plastic tubes on cardboard, 170 x 170 cm (right)
Zsolt Feranczy, Bestiary, Iceman (The Burden of the Past), 2019 – 2020, ink, acrylic, plastic tubes on cardboard, 210 x 120 cm (left) and Tasmanian Wolf, 2019 – 2020, ink, acrylic, plastic tubes on cardboard, 170 x 170 cm (right)

History, especially Hungarian history, is challenging to comment on, especially when it comes to—and it always does— talking about the fight for freedom. In the 19th century the Habsburg Monarchy ruled Hungary. Their high taxation interfered with the developments of Hungarian agriculture, animal breeding and industry. To show their resistance, Hungarians dressed in the traditional outfits of mounted horse-herdsman (csikós), including baggy pants (bő gatya), long coats ofter lined with fur, fur hats (kucsma), peaky hats (csákó), and carried a sword and spoke Hungarian. It was meant to show their resistance. The figures in Horsemen gathering bombs and The Rebel wore those traditional clothes and actively engaged in the rebellion that came to a conclusion in the war of 1848 against the Habsburgs. They are forboding images. We can feel that death is at the gate. The compositions are almost fairy-tale-like. In both paintings, the figures are elongated, giving them some eerie, magical appearance, wearing traditional Hungarian clothes as symbols of their political stand. The landscape is the great Hungarian Plain but we can’t really recognize it as it is modified to tell the story. There is a hyena who feeds on carcases, at the feet of one of the horsemen in The horsemen gathering bombs, snakes are fighting at the top of a flag. The bomb (that didn’t exist at that time) is on the ground. The Rebel is mounted on his horse, holding a sword, ready to fight. There are both peaceful (the resting deer) and worrisome (the agitated swan) animals around him. We face the dangerous pink clouds again and bombs are falling from the sky to destroy this budding rebellion. Pink/red light radiates from the rebel’s head, giving him the status of a hero.

L-R: Zsolt Ferenczy, Horsemen gathering bombs (Bombászó csikósok) and The Rebel (A lázadó), each 2020, oil on canvas, 150 x 100 cm
L-R: Zsolt Ferenczy, Horsemen gathering bombs (Bombászó csikósok) and The Rebel (A lázadó), each 2020, oil on canvas, 150 x 100 cm

As I mentioned earlier, I saw It’s time as a conclusion of Ferenczy painterly symbolism. Beside a Tisza-type boat (Tisza is a large river in Hungary) a boy in a peaky hat stands. There are animals around the boats, rabbits jumping playfully, a lizard, a deer looking into the distance, and a seagull flying above. In our world of environmental issues like global warming, forest fires and floods as well as political uncertainties, we never know what’s coming. We don’t know where the issues are coming from, what or who caused them, but disasters are coming for sure. This boy, like a “New Noah” is waiting for it to happen, possibly a flood, but there is no water rising yet. Everyone is waiting and ready. The animals are nearby, the two monkeys, like sailors are waiting. It is the quiet moment before the storm. The sky behind reminds us of the sky in Dark Material. Ferenczy wrote: “The sky always shows a different formation than the sphere below, but there is always something that connects the two. I borrowed the floating shape from astrophysical models that illustrate the motion of the black holes or galaxies. The danger, the sign of times, always appear in the sky …” Indeed, it does. The red shapes might be fires burning with dark smoke, while the blue, like exploding splashes of water that will rise and endanger everything. When it happens, the birdhouse is the only hope, the symbol of home, a way to escape from danger, and a chance for survival.

Zsolt Frenczy: It’s time (Itt az idő), 2020, oil on canvas, 170 x 120 cm
Zsolt Frenczy: It’s time (Itt az idő), 2020, oil on canvas, 170 x 120 cm

Like a crown, there is a purple atomic shape hovering at the very top of the composition, inviting the future into the upcoming catastrophe. Is it only observing? Or is it there to help or give us some hope? We don’t know. It’s like a poem. You don’t have to understand every motif to relate to the story and enjoy the vision.

Why Keep the Figure? Anna-Maria Škroba at YveYANG

by Kun Sok

I kept returning to the turquoise table in Anna-Maria Škroba’s Nazar. A seated figure occupies the center, but the table holds my attention. Its saturated color and sharply angled edge give it a force the sitter never acquires. The face has been reduced to a gray oval, while the black clothing breaks apart against the open weave of the jute. Though porous in places, the table seems to push forward. The person recedes.

Anna-Maria Škroba, Nazar, 2026, oil and gouache on jute 18 x 13 inches (Images courtesy of the artist and YveYANG Gallery)
Anna-Maria Škroba, Nazar, 2026, oil and gouache on jute 18 x 13 inches (Images courtesy of the artist and YveYANG Gallery)

That reversal raises a question that follows Škroba’s solo exhibition, I’m raining before the rain, at YveYANG: Why does she continue to paint the human figure while allowing other elements to overpower it?

Her figures are rarely absent. They sit, recline, walk, or occupy the middle of a field, yet they seldom govern the picture. Tables, roads, expanses of color, and the exposed fabric beneath the paint exert competing pressures. Škroba treats the figure less as a commanding subject than as something vulnerable to its surroundings. The body gives those surroundings something to act upon.

Anna-Maria Škroba, Neither-Nor (Bolshaya), 2025, oil on jute, 90½ x 63 inches
Anna-Maria Škroba, Neither-Nor (Bolshaya), 2025, oil on jute, 90½ x 63 inches

This is especially clear in Neither-Nor (Bolshaya). A seated woman appears within a monumental turquoise field, indicated by thin reddish-gray lines describing her head, torso, and bent legs. The figure is large, but scale does not translate into authority. The surrounding color carries greater visual weight, while the rough weave remains visible across body and ground. The woman never separates cleanly from the surface. She appears held within the field and partially undone by it.

Without the figure, the turquoise expanse might read primarily as a formal event—a field of color interrupted by paint and fabric. The body changes the stakes. It allows the field to feel enveloping, resistant, perhaps indifferent. The figure does not explain the space, but makes its force perceptible.

Škroba’s handling of paint intensifies this relation. On jute, pigment settles into translucent passages, accumulates in thicker patches, or catches unevenly on the raised weave. At times the fabric appears more definite than the image painted over it. A shoulder or knee may gather into recognizable form, while surrounding marks remain closer to abrasion, stain, or drag. The support does not simply carry the image; it interferes with its coherence.

In space, a reclining figure stretches across a muted green field. The body is pale and elongated, but the weave beneath it remains insistently present. The person seems less placed upon the fabric than absorbed into it. Here the figure gives material tension a bodily consequence. The jute’s resistance becomes more than texture because a body is attempting to distinguish itself from it.

Anna-Maria Škroba, High perspective, 2026, oil on canvas, 38⅝ x 33½ inches
Anna-Maria Škroba, High perspective, 2026, oil on canvas, 38⅝ x 33½ inches

High perspective approaches the question differently. Painted on canvas, it presents a curving gray road, a green slope, a broad diagonal shadow, and two small figures in the distance. The people are nearly reduced to punctuation marks. The road and shadow organize the picture, directing the eye and establishing scale. Still, the figures turn an arrangement of directional forms into a traversed space. Their smallness makes the landscape feel expansive, while their movement gives the road purpose.

This may be why Škroba keeps returning to the figure. Her paintings need a human presence, though not necessarily a human center. The body provides scale, fragility, and consequence. It allows a table to dominate, a field to engulf, or a road to exceed the person crossing it. The figure remains so that its loss of control can be seen.

The exhibition’s title, I’m raining before the rain, folds weather into the speaker. The self becomes a condition rather than a stable center. Škroba’s figures occupy a comparable position: they register the pressures of color, texture, and scale without mastering any of them.

Anna-Maria Škroba, May, 2026, oil on jute, 16⅞ x 11¾ inches
Anna-Maria Škroba, May, 2026, oil on jute, 16⅞ x 11¾ inches

There are limits to this approach. In May, a pale vertical form occupies a mottled yellow-green surface, but it is difficult to determine whether the shape is a person, an architectural fragment, or an accumulation of lighter paint. The uncertainty produces little friction because too little distinction remains to place under pressure. Exposed weave and blurred form begin to supply a generalized atmosphere rather than a specific pictorial relation.

This is the risk of Škroba’s recognizable vocabulary. Blurred faces, muted fields, fragmented silhouettes, and visible jute are familiar features of contemporary figurative painting. Her strongest works move beyond that familiarity by establishing a precise conflict between the figure and what surrounds it. The weaker ones rely on material roughness to generate mood.

Anna-Maria Škroba, Installation View, “Why Keep the Figure? Anna-Maria Škroba” at YveYANG
Anna-Maria Škroba, Installation View, “Why Keep the Figure? Anna-Maria Škroba” at YveYANG

Škroba’s figures matter most when they remain necessary without becoming sovereign. They do not dominate the paintings, yet their presence prevents color, fabric, and space from becoming purely formal. A body sits, reclines, or walks through the picture, and the world around it acquires force. The figure stays so that we can watch it lose control.

Anna-Maria Škroba: I’m raining before the rain July 9 – August 21, 2026 at YveYANG, 12 Wooster St., New York, NY 10013

The Silence of the Philosophers

by Steve Rockwell

Steve Rockwell, Mime on Melrose, Abandoned Painting, 1995, acrylic on canvas with wood and masonite frame, 52 x 48 inches. The painted work is a double-frame record of the "abandonment," a work within a work
Steve Rockwell, Mime on Melrose, Abandoned Painting, Los Angeles, CA, 1995, acrylic on canvas with wood and masonite frame, 52 x 48 inches. The painted work is a double-frame record of the “abandonment,” a work within a work

It’s a joke readymade. My painting of Marcel Marceau was “abandoned” on Melrose Avenue on April 1, 1994 in Los Angeles. Yes, Mime on Melrose had been a sight gag – a “silent” French actor trapped within a canvas in Hollywood, where no one could hear him scream. Of course, revenge would come in the form of five Oscars in 2011 at the 84th Academy Awards.

Michel Hazanavicius's The Artist (2011), starring Jean Dujardin and Bérénice Bejo (and Uggie). The film deliberately recreates the visual language of late-1920s silent Hollywood
Michel Hazanavicius’s The Artist (2011), starring Jean Dujardin and Bérénice Bejo (and Uggie). The film deliberately recreates the visual language of late-1920s silent Hollywood

The Artist became the first silent film, to win best picture since Wings in 1929. The Michel Hazenavicius film pulled off a historic sweep, Jean Dujardin, being the first French actor ever to win the category. So, there! To rub it in, directing, score, and costume took the remaining Oscars.

My own bias for the visual sense developed when the world fell silent as a child. When I lost my hearing due to enlarged adenoids, I compensated by just looking harder. Images of the operation itself, as a five-year-old, are still quite clear: arms being strapped to the chair, an anesthesia mask much like a small lamp shade raised to my face – then coming to, seeing the doctor waving surgical tweezers with some whitish tissue.

The 1882 Gustav-Adolf Schultze photographs are among the best-known portraits of Nietzsche. The series was made in Naumburg in September 1882; one version became associated with the later Thus Spoke Zarathustra image
The 1882 Gustav-Adolf Schultze photographs are among the best-known portraits of Nietzsche. The series was made in Naumburg in September 1882; one version became associated with the later Thus Spoke Zarathustra image

In the field of philosophy, the cone of “silence” seemed to have fallen over one particular thinker. Apparently, Friedrich Nietzsche had been fearful. In a confession to a friend, even the mere mention of this individual’s name publicly, might have resulted in a charge of plagiarism against Nietzsche. Karl Marx took the opposite approach. Together with Engels, they spent a year writing a 500 page attack-book in an effort to silence him. One of the most obsessive, explosive feuds in the history of political theory was the result.

Karl Marx, 1875 photograph by John Jabez Edwin Mayall
Karl Marx, 1875 photograph by John Jabez Edwin Mayall

Marcel Duchamp had called “Philosopher X” the primary intellectual influence on his entire artistic output. Here he found the catalyst for his break from conventional painting and subsequent invention of the ready-made. “X” argued that State, Religion, Humanity, Morality, and Truth are “spooks,” they being fixed ideas employed to subjugate the individual ego. Applied to the art world, Art, Taste, and Genius are “social spooks,” that required systematic demolition. In practice, a state of personal autonomy might be achieved through absolute indifference to societal expectations.

1952 portrait of Duchamp as the work of Eliot Elisofon, a Life staff photographer. “Dada’s Daddy,” published April 28, 1952. The article was by Winthrop Sargeant
Portrait of Duchamp is the work of Eliot Elisofon, a Life staff photographer. “Dada’s Daddy,” published April 28, 1952. The article was by Winthrop Sargeant

Readers of philosophy would recognize the mystery thinker as Max Stirner. At the core, Stirner rejected authority in any form. These illusions, mental ghosts, or “spooks,” having been banished, a “creative nothing” was possible. The ego now free from all ideologies, situated in a state of total intellectual neutrality – a clean slate. Stirner’s 1844, The Ego and Its Own, was the career-defining work that Duchamp discovered while staying in Munich around 1912.

The concept of a societal clean slate has a precedent in the French Revolution, 1793 being “Year One.” With history erased, time reset, the birth of a new world could now be governed strictly by reason. Churches across France were stripped of religious imagery, now dubbed “Temples of Reason.” Opera actress, Sophie Momoro, portrayed the Goddess of Reason in the newly-minted Festival of Reason at the Notre-Dame Cathedral.

There are thinkers, and there are doers. To implement the wiping of the cultural slate, doers are required. The tool, during the Reign of Terror, became the guillotine – a humane, rational instrument of social progress, egalitarian and swift. Another “Year Zero” was attempted in Cambodia. Somewhere between 1.5 and 3 million people died in the Killing Fields during Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge regime (1975-1979). Coming from a wealthy background, Pol Pot was educated in France, but had been a mediocre student. He had a political awakening that led him to co-found the Marxist Circle and join the French Communist Party.

During the Pol Pot regime, 1976 was the transitional year when the Khmer Rouge officially codified their radical society. Cambodia had now ceased to exist by name, replaced by a totalitarian agrarian slave-state. On January 5 of that year, the Democratic Kampuchea abolished all private property, cancelled the national currency, outlawed all religions, and stripped away basic human rights. Up until 1976 the public had not formally known who was running the country.

Silent Movie, 1976, theatrical poster illustrated by John Alvin
Mel Brooks, Silent Movie, 1976, theatrical poster illustrated by John Alvin

In 1976 Silent Movie is released. Mel Brooks played Mel Funn, a once-successful Hollywood director attempting a comeback. He persuaded a failing studio to finance an extraordinary project: a full-length silent movie. To make his imaginary film commercially irresistible, Funn tried to recruit major stars. Brooks therefore turned the film into a parade of contemporary celebrity cameos: Burt Reynolds, Paul Newman, Liza Minnelli, Anne Bancroft, James Caan, and Marcel Marceau. They appeared essentially as themselves.

The principal theatrical poster was illustrated by John Alvin, whose design turns Brooks into a comic silent-film hero, with the huge three-dimensional SILENT MOVIE title and Brooks making the classic “shhh” gesture.

Performance portrait of Marcel Marceau in classic white face, striped shirt and exaggerated gesture
Performance portrait of Marcel Marceau in classic white face, striped shirt and exaggerated gesture

The joke is that Silent Movie itself is essentially a silent film: without spoken dialogue, communication relies on physical performance, title cards, music, and sound effects. The single exception is Marcel Marceau uttering the film’s only audible word. – NON!